Well I’ve received more than 100 emails now asking me to post my response to the Federal Election.
In terms of campaigning, Labor smashed Liberal, hands down. We can’t blame the voters for their inability to see the bigger picture. We failed the Australian people in that we weren’t able to sell them on our vision. We also failed them in being unable to convince them of the benefits of Workchoices.
Fact : Good economic policy often creates glaring losers when policy is initially enacted. It’s a sign of good government that you’re willing to risk your position to do the right thing, not the popular thing - look at the GST, Education reforms, and Workchoices. In every re-elected term they have engaged in a major reform, and every one has majorly slugged part of the constituent base for the long-term good of Australia. Income taxation reform may sound nice to you but it has actually slugged big business, massively. Noone writes about this.
Labor has partially learnt its lesson if you look around the nation. The NSW government is doing a woeful, horrible, disastrous job which is massively hurting the State but the other ones are puttering along.
The problem with Labor is that they’re not bad anymore, they’re just mediocre. We’ve signed up for a decade or so of just.. meidocrity. It doesn’t make me angry, it just makes me feel really deflated. Imagine your friend had all potential in the world and decided to spend his whole life as a janitor. That’s deflating. The decision for second best? That’s deflating.
Obviously Rudd will bring some good aspects which I’m looking forward to. I’m not a scare-mongerer, and I’m not particularly worried about Australia’s future as Keating and then the Liberals have given us such a good foundation it would take some extraordinary incompetence to lose this.
A few disappointments:
1. My friend Emanuele Cicchiello lost. Not so much a surprise, but the other guy is totally lazy and doesn’t deserve to work at Safeway let alone run a nation.
2. Mal Brough is probably the most mourned loss within the Liberal Party. He deserved much better.
3. Peter Costello is a loss in 3 years time but his expertise is now lost. He’s an incredibly brilliant man, and now Australia has lost their chance. That makes me very sad.
4. Rudd would make a good Cabinet minister but his team is useless. Crean is decent quality, Albanese, Tanner and Swan are junior minister quality, Gillard is not minister quality (I have no idea why people rate her), Garrett is barely MP quality. Conroy, Smith, Faulkner, Combet, Shorten wil probably be either decent or junior in quality.
There’s none thereĀ who I would describe as super-talented (only Rudd and Beazley fit that bill for me), which half of the Liberal ministry was. Should be an interesting few years.
1 comment
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link
http://www.matnewton.com/the-election-2/trackback/
November 27, 2007 at 2:58 pm
Anthony
I think that’s a fairly good piece of analysis. As you say in another post, there were some good arguments for WorkChoices but the government didn’t argue its case very well. I’d also point out that as well as tackling unemployment the laws were designed to destroy the unions (and hence the ALP’s financial backing). On that second point WorkChoices would be unacceptable to people because they look devisive and arrogant.
Agree with you totally on Gillard and Garret. What has Gillard done to show she is capable of being a minister? As for Garret, his qualifications are that he’s a musician (no offence to musicians) but I mean, seriously, why would anyone be happy that he’s in charge of making environmental policy for the government?