The fact that only 8% of students pay for student services shows that Student Unions are not offering services that students want.
Put simply, if unions offered services they would receive the money from the students, and this legislation has been in WA for many years now, and unions over there are becoming more and more accountable, and membership is now up to 30% and rising, due to unions being accountable now for more than a decade.
And if those services were used by students, and were such great value in the first place, students wouldn’t need to be coerced into paying them, they would pay because they gain something that the student themselves decide is value for money.
But students have decided that student unions as they exist are useless, they’ve voted with their dollars, and a smart move. No longer are they being coerced into paying money that goes to unions that are then represented at NUS, which then debate the 9 different ways to spell woman (which was a serious motion last year at Monash University).
Compulsory student unionism is a clear violation of a fundamental human right, the freedom of association. This is a listed right under the UN’s declaration on human rights.
Why should any student pay for services they don’t use? Why is having a choice on campus such an outrage in the first place?
Recent Comments