Yep that’s right. All hot and bothered.
The active supporters of Melbourne Victory would be really good advocates of human rights. Why? Because they’re incredibly suspicious of the motives of authority, extremely vocal when they feel their rights are being impinged upon, and will cop the punishment for standing up for themselves.
Fans have been campaigning ever since our move to Telstra Dome to have the right to play a drum during chants. Telstra Dome has so far rejected these advances because of concerns about a ‘tribal’ atmosphere.
Seriously ! I’m not making this stuff up. One wonders if they have ever been to an AFL game.
Between them, Telstra Dome and MVFC management have shown that they don’t have what it takes to deal with soccer fans. Is it so hard to just… give us what we want? Instead, they use things such as drums - legal in stadiums world-wide - as bargaining chips.
It doesn’t take a very smart person to realise that by setting themselves up with such an antagonistic attitude, they’re really shooting themselves in the foot. Market research by the FFA and MVFC has shown that the #1 highlight for fans going to games is the atmosphere. The atmosphere developed by who, exactly ? The active support!
So then they do all their advertising around the active support, telling us all what an amazing atmosphere it is. But who are they constantly trying to disenfranchise? The active support!
Collective punishment causes the innocent to rally with the guilty. The guilty use the collective punishments as justification for their ongoing campaigns.
By allowing standing, drums, and megaphones, those supporters who DO want to cause trouble no longer have any leg to stand on, and importantly, will not win the sympathy of those who aren’t there to make trouble.
It seems to be such a difficult idea to grasp - the USA took 3 years to finally get the picture in Iraq. The way you get the majority you like to separate from the minority you don’t is to give the majority what they want. Da-na!
Recent Comments