As it currently stands, I haven’t given much opportunity for people to comment on my previous post. Both big replies so far have revolved around two broad themes.
Sorry to those who don’t care about this topic. Just click to the next blog on your Reader, the next post will be more interesting.
“Context is my friend.”
This is a curious one. Because for mine, even context can not justify some things. I think some of the commands God gives in the Old Testament are absolutely abominable… and just have so much trouble believing that a God that is supposedly of love could just be so flippant about the wanton destruction of human lives.
The verse that started it all.. when I was about 14 or so. I have never since managed to reconcile myself to the OT.
Joshua 8:24-25
When it was all over, Israel had killed everyone in Ai, whether in the fields or in the wilderness where they had chased them. When the killing was complete, the Israelites returned to Ai and completed the devastation. The death toll that day came to twelve thousand men and women—everyone in Ai.
Or when Achan buried the loot from Jericho under his tent and they destroyed his entire family. I mean, can you imagine the children being dragged uncomprehending into the bottom of that pit as hard eyes watched them, ready with their stones to do the unthinkable….? The women pleading for their lives as their bodies slowly became unrecognisable, shapeless forms…? How would YOU feel if God asked you to do this kind of thing?
A typical answer to this would involve something about sin being generational or God’s need for holiness. But have I read and been told about a God of justice and punishing one person for anothers mistake isn’t just. If anyone can truly justify this decision by God I will give you a medal. (Seriously, I’ll mail it to you.)
This and so many other verses and decisions are something that Christians would never abide in today’s world. Yet we abide it in the pre-Christian world! Jesus didn’t invent morality.
The fact that Brett in his comment turned towards NT to justify the opposition to homosexuality shows what I mean - that without NT backup, an OT command is worthless.
I agree that the OT gives us a broader appreciation of the significance of the NT. This is a given. But a broader appreciation of God…. ? Depends on how you define the word appreciation.
“You need the Old Testament to understand the New Testament.”
Yes that is true. But as I said in my example yesterday, the Muslims need the Haditha to understand the Koran yet do not ascribe it the same level of holiness.
We can venerate it in some parts. Even just re-name it back to its Jewish name. And we can have a naming competition for the New Testament a la McDonalds (which has called its new burger the Backyard Burger. And it is very tasty, I’m a fan.)
Recent Comments